State Ex Rel. Departments of Transportation & Labor v. Enserch Alaska Construction, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
This appeal involves the constitutionality of AS 36.10.160 which provides a hiring preference to residents of economically distressed zones for certain employment on public works projects. The superior court, Judge Douglas J. Serdahely, declared the law unconstitutional under Alaska’s equal protection clause. We affirm the superior court’s decision on the unconstitutionality of the regional preference law and its rulings concerning waiver, intervention, and standing. We reverse the superior court’s ruling on the right to seek damages for the state’s enforcement of the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AnthonyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.