Legal Opinion
United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of Camden
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 21, 1984No. 81-2110PublishedCited by 285 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
A municipal ordinance of the city of Camden, New Jersey, requires that at least 40% of the employees of contractors and subcontractors working on city construction projects be Camden residents. Appellant, the United Building and Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity (Council), challenges that ordinance as a violation of the Privileges and Immunities Clause, Art. IV, § 2, cl. 1, of the United States Constitution.1 The Supreme Court of New Jersey rejected appellant’s privileges and immunities attack on the ground that the ordinance discriminates on the basis of municipal,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by285 opinions
- McBurney v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. WunnickeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Peterson v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
280 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.