Legal Opinion
William B. Sullivan v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1960No. 16365_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
Appellant filed in the district court below a petition denominated “Motion for a Subpoena Duces Tecum.” The district court treated the petition as one for a writ of habeas corpus, and denied it on the ground that three previous petitions by Sullivan had been presented to the same court and denied. The district court refused to issue a certificate of probable cause on appeal, but a certificate of probable cause was heretofore granted by this Court.
On June 9, 1960, after the brief of ap-pellee had been filed, but before filing of appellant’s closing brief, Sullivan filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- United States of America Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- United States ex rel. Sullivan v. HeinzeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goodman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Marsillo v. National Surety Corp.District Court, D. Montana · 1986
- Mahler v. DrakeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
- State of West Virginia v. Michael J. McGillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Jordan Blair v. Bob WillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.