Legal Opinion

People v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1950No. Crim. 2650PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment rendered upon a verdict convicting him of the crime of rape, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Appellant assigns as error: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, (2) improper admission of evidence of another alleged offense, (3) errors of law occurring during the trial, (4) prior jeopardy, and (5) that he was prosecuted by information instead of indictment, and the names of witnesses were not endorsed upon the information.. Cl] Our examination- of the record demonstrates that the evidence supports the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. OverackerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. People v. NearyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Paulson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. FinchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. MinkowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Rhine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API