Legal Opinion
Goodman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1966No. 20811PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal in a civil action by which appellants sought the return of certain documents, and to suppress evidence. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, accepted jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a), but dismissed the complaint on the merits. The jurisdiction of this court has been put in issue. It is alleged by appellants to rest on 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Prior to March, 1962, one James Pinkerton was the sole owner of Paramount Ice Cream Company (Paramount). About then he sold his interest to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Clifford O. Boren, Delta M. Boren and Clifford O. Boren Contracting Co., Inc. v. Lloyd M. Tucker, Special Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold GrutchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. RoundtreeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.