Marsillo v. National Surety Corp.
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LOVELL, District Judge.
This action arises out of a fire which destroyed the place of business of Debtors Roger and Diane Bergeson on June 12, 1982. At the time of the fire the debtors, *694who were then undergoing reorganization pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, were insured by defendant National Surety Corporation (National). The policy of insurance contained a “business interruption” clause, which allegedly covered loss of income and additional expense resulting from debtors’ inability to operate the business following the fire.
The complaint, filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Goodman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Gibson v. Western Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Palmer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Pete Rinaldi's Fast Foods, Inc. v. Great American Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Allstate Indem. Co. v. RuizSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.