Legal Opinion

Marsillo v. National Surety Corp.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided November 7, 1986No. CV 84-232-M-CCLPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LOVELL, District Judge.

This action arises out of a fire which destroyed the place of business of Debtors Roger and Diane Bergeson on June 12, 1982. At the time of the fire the debtors, *694who were then undergoing reorganization pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, were insured by defendant National Surety Corporation (National). The policy of insurance contained a “business interruption” clause, which allegedly covered loss of income and additional expense resulting from debtors’ inability to operate the business following the fire.

The complaint, filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Goodman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. Gibson v. Western Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Palmer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Pete Rinaldi's Fast Foods, Inc. v. Great American Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
  4. Allstate Indem. Co. v. RuizSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API