Legal Opinion

People v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1950No. Crim. 2622PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of section 261, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code and sentenced to the penitentiary. He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.

Appellant in his brief sets out the five contentions,—(1) that evidence of another alleged offense was improperly admitted; (2) insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment; (3) errors of law arising during the trial; (4) error in the instructions, and (5) that the acts complained of did not constitute rape. None of the five points, excepting the first, is developed in appellant’s brief, hence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. DabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. LisenbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. IngCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Nester v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. CovertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. MinkowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API