State v. Kirkland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for negotiating a bad check, ORS 165.065. He asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal, because the state failed to prove the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.
In reviewing the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Shields, 184 Or App 505, 509, 56 P3d 937 (2002). The pertinent facts are few.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- B. R. B. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- B. R. B. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.