Legal Opinion

State v. Shields

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 2002No. 98CR1244; CA A105000PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of stalking. ORS 163.732. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and the court’s refusal to give one of his requested jury instructions. We affirm.

Because a jury found defendant guilty, we set out the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Tucker, 315 Or 321, 325, 845 P2d 904 (1993). We first set out facts in the record that, while not directly related to the events that led to this prosecution, provide context for defendant’s relationship with the victim. See Boyd v. Essin, 170 Or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. ParagonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Castro v. HeinzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API