Legal Opinion

State v. Short

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1987No. M86-12-418; CA A43595PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for negotiating a bad check. ORS 165.065. The issue is whether the trial court erred in giving the state’s requested jury instruction regarding an inference of knowledge that the check would be dishonored.

ORS 165.065 provides, in part:

“(1) A person commits the crime of negotiating a bad check if the person makes, draws or utters a check or similar sight order for the payment of money, knowing that it will not be honored by the drawee.
“(2) For purposes of this section, unless the check or order is postdated, it is prima facie evidence of knowledge that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API