State v. Jacobs
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
DE MUNIZ, S. J.
Defendant appeals a conviction for unlawful delivery of marijuana, ORS 475.860, resisting arrest, ORS 162.315, and tampering with physical evidence, ORS 162.295. With respect to his conviction for tampering with physical evidence, defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he knew that an official proceeding was about to be instituted when he destroyed evidence.1 We affirm.
We state the facts in the light most favorable to the state and review those facts to determine whether a rational jury could find the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. BainbridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MartineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- B. R. B. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- State v. RexroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- B. R. B. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- State v. LivelyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018