Legal Opinion

Lenow v. Arrington

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Anneal from Chancery Court of Shelby County.—F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

This suit involves the construction of the will of Jos. Lenow, and the question of the power of the chancery court to sell lands belonging to the estate, as affected by the statute (Shannon’s Code, section 5089).

The will, so far as is necessary to be set out, is as follows :

*724“(3) I direct that my real estate I may own at my death shall be kept together during the life of my wife, and that until her death one-third of the net proceeds of the annual rents and profits of said real estate be received and enjoyed by her for her sole and separate use,” etc.
“(4) I direct that until my wife’s death…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ridley v. HallidayTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hurt v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Vaccaro v. CicallaTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. B. F. Avery & Sons v. Hunton Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Bond v. PerkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Ricardi v. GabouryTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Johnson v. CovingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Weakley v. BarrowTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Holt v. HamlinTennessee Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API