Legal Opinion

Holt v. Hamlin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1908PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County.— F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

On the 27th of July, 1907, the complainant, as guardian of her child, the defendant John F. Hamlin, filed her original bill against said John F. Hamlin, a child .aged nine years, and Blanche Hamlin Kruger and her husband, E. T. Kruger. The complainant was joined by her husband, J. P. Holt, as a formal party.

The bill alleged that on the 29th of November, 1899, John F. Hamlin, the former husband of the complainant and the father of'the defendant John F. Hamlin, Jr., died in Shelby county, having first made his last will and testament, by which he devised to the complainant, Mrs. Holt, then Mrs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hurt v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bierce v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lenow v. ArringtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Rutherford v. RutherfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Chickamauga Trust Co. v. LonasTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Johnson v. CovingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McConnell v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Holt v. HoltTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API