Legal Opinion

Bond v. Perkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1871PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM haywood. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court, November Term,' 1870. Gideon B. Blach, J. cited Thorington v. Smith, 8 Wal, 1; Naff v. Crawford, 1 Heis., Ill; Chitty on Contr., 589; Mart v. Enloe, 1 Yer., 458. cited 8 "Wal, 1; 1 Heis., Ill; Sherfy v. Argenbright, lb., 128; 4 BL, 74.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholsoN, C. J.

This is an action of debt in the Circuit Court of Haywood county, on a promissory note in tlie following words:

$824.41. “ Twelve months after date, I promise to pay N. T. Perkins eight hundred and twenty-four 41-100 dollars, with interest from date. June 2d, 1862.

Thomas BoNd.”

Defendant put in two pleas: first, Nil debet; second, that the note sued on was given for Confederate money or notes. To the latter plea plaintiff’ replied, that if the note was given for Confederate money or notes, the same were of full and equal value to lawful money or Treasury notes of the United States, at the time…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ricardi v. GabouryTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lenow v. ArringtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. McGavock v. McGavockCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  5. Barrett v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API