Legal Opinion

Ricardi v. Gaboury

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

PROM KNOX. Appeal from-Chancery Court, Knox County. — Joseph W. Sneed, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

The complainant Mary J. Ricardi is the owner of an undivided one-half, and her co-complainant Kellie R. Gaboury of an undivided one-eighth, interest, while the defendants, who are minors and grandchildren, as well as wards, of Mary J. Ricardi, are the owners of the remaining three-eighths interest, in a certain lot fronting twenty-five feet on the west side of Gay street, and running back between parallel lines 102 feet to an alley, situate in the city of Knoxville. On this lot there, stands a business house now occupied under a five-year lease. The annual rental of this property is $1,350,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marsh v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ridley v. HallidayTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hurt v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Mills v. DennisNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  5. Hedges v. RikerNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Upham v. PlankintonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cabin Valley Mining Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Johnson v. CovingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Weakley v. BarrowTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cowles v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API