Legal Opinion

Ridley v. Halliday

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1901PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Ií-ROjVT MATTRY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Maury County. ANDREW J. AbERNATHYj Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

In 1895 J. W. S. Ridley, by deed of gift, conveyed to liis son, Webb Ridley, a valuable farm of five hundred and eighty acres of land, in the county of Maury, upon the following trusts: That the said Webb Ridley, trustee, should permit and suffer his son, William Ridley, for and during his natural life, to have and receive the rents, incomes, and profits of said lands, and to exercise such control over the use, occupation, renting, and cultivation thereof as he, the said William, might deem proper, but in such way, nevertheless, that such lands, and the rents, incomes, and profits thereof,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Faulkner v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
  3. Ruggles v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Baylor's lessee v. DejarnetteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1856
  5. Hurt v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Springs v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Ussery v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Nickas v. CapadalisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. Cooney v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API