Legal Opinion

Christofferson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 28, 2005No. 01-495CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending in this federal employee overtime pay case are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment and defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs’ claims are brought under both the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000) (“FLSA”), and the Federal Employee Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 5541-5550a (2000) (“PEPA”). In dispute is the amount of overtime pay, if any, due plaintiffs arising out of work done to complete the 2000 census. Although the suit is brought on behalf of former census employees all over the country, the present motions focus on the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Moreno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Christofferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API