Legal Opinion

Moreno v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 3, 2008No. 05-142CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).1 The plaintiffs, employees of the former United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”),2 brought this suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000), to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant, the United States (“government” or “defendant”), failed to pay them *389overtime wages at a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nehmelman v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Johnson v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
  4. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Moreno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API