Legal Opinion
Christofferson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 6, 2007No. 01-495CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a federal employee pay case brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201-219 (2000) and the Federal Employee Pay Act (“FEPA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 5541-5550a (2000). Plaintiffs initially sought compensation only for unpaid overtime worked during the 2000 Decennial Census. Pending now is plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file their second amended complaint, which seeks to add a new cause of action for the payment of regular hours of work, or straight time, for which plaintiffs were not paid. The matter is fully briefed. Oral argument was held on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Brian F. Monahan v. County Of Chesterfield, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Mitsui Foods, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Metcalf Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Christofferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.