Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sandquist v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1919No. 21,552PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Upon the relation of E. E. SancLquist the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for Blue Earth county to review the proceedings in that court, Comstock, J., convicting relator of contempt of court.

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Relator was convicted of a contempt of court not committed in the presence of the court, fined $50 and committed to jail for 30 days in default of the payment of the fine.

The case is brought here by writ of certiorari. The court permitted the state to call the relator for cross-examination under the statute and to examine him as a witness against himself. This is assigned as error, and we are of the opinion that it was and that there must be a reversal on this ground.

Relator was arrested on the complaint of the mother of a girl 17 years old, charging him with the crime of having…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. State v. ThadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Carli v. Stillwater & Saint Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  5. State ex rel. Russell v. IvesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SpainIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. State v. BinderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. State v. RixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API