State v. Thaden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The defendant was jointly indicted with two others (Partello and Tall) for forgery in the second degi-ee, by putting off as true upon one Christianson a false and forged promissory note purporting to have been executed by one Linstad. He demanded and was granted a separate trial, and the state called, as a witness in its behalf, Linstad, the person whose name was alleged to have been forged. The first error assigned is the ruling of the trial court in compelling this witness to answer certain questions, he having previously declined to do so, claiming that the same might tend to criminate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Temple v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- State v. GliddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Card v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. WeismanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Commonwealth v. StuartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.