Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Russell v. Ives

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1895No. Nos. 9340, 9347PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Certiorari. W. D. Russell and Hugh Quigley were each adjudged by the district court for Polk county, Ives, J., guilty of contempt of court, without the introduction of any evidence to support the charges against them.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

The relators in these cases, on January 30, 1895, were arrested by virtue of a- warrant issued for that purpose, and brought before the district court, in and for the county of Polk, to show cause why they should not be punished for an alleged contempt of court and such proceedings were then and subsequently had and taken in such matter that each of them was convicted of the charge. The relator Russell was thereupon adjudged to pay a fine of $250, and be imprisoned in the county jail 30 days, and a fine of $100 was imposed upon the relator Quigley. Upon the application of each of…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Hampton v. HamptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Ex Parte LandryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API