Legal Opinion

State v. Rixon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1930No. Nos. 28,081, 28,082PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendants were indicted for arson and each moved to quash the indictment on the ground that they had been compelled to testify against themselves before the grand jury. The motions were denied; but, deeming the matters involved doubtful and important, the trial court certified to this court two questions for decision. We need answer but one of the questions certified, for that will dispose of both cases. While the record presented’in the Phelps case is not the same as in the Kixon case, it is sufficiently similar in respect to the one question to be answered to dispose of both cases.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. The People v. . MondonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. People v. BermelNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Boone v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Tuttle v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Laba v. Newark Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Poach v. SlySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State v. CatellierWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. People v. CliffordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API