Parker v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The essential facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff contends the court’s finding No. 6, unexcepted to, is conclusive, and esi tablishes his right to recover under the policy. However, the defendant, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence and again at the conclusion of all the evidence, moved for judgment of nonsuit. Exceptions to the refusal to nonsuit were taken and are assigned as error. Consequently, the question whether No. 6 is a finding of fact, a conclusion of law, or a combination of both, is immaterial. The sufficiency of all the evidence to support the judgment is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Powers v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Clark v. Federal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Mullins v. National Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Register v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Walsh v. United Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Huffman v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF RALEIGHSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.