Legal Opinion

Huffman v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF RALEIGH

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1965No. 441PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

The sole question for decision is whether the court below properly interpreted the applicable provision of the insurance policy.

The “Supplement” to the insurance policy provides: “It is agreed . . . that if the Insured . . . shall sustain PERSONAL Bodily INjuky which is effected solely through external, violent and accidental means . . . , and which directly and independently of all other causes results in any of the losses enumerated in the schedule of losses and indemnities, which appears below, within 90 days thereafter, the company will pay ... to the Insured ... (according to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Parker v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Carolina Real Estate Co. v. BlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Stanback v. Winston Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Clark v. Federal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Williams v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Robert A. Cornellier v. American Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API