Legal Opinion

Clark v. Federal Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 26, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

There was no conflict in tbe evidence offered upon tbe trial of this action. Tbe uncontroverted facts pertinent to tbe issue submitted to tbe jury, without objection from either plaintiff or defendant, were as follows:

1. On 21 April, 1925, defendant issued to plaintiff a receipt, in writing, in form as follows :

$2.00 4/21/25

Official Eeceipt for Annual Premium on Federalized Travel Accident Policy

Eeceived of Linwood E. Clark tbe sum of two and no/100 in payment of tbe annual premium for a Federalized Travel Accident Policy, maintaining said policy in force for one year from date of its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rayburn v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Lea v. Atlantic InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Roanoke Railroad & Lumber v. PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Financial Security Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Robert A. Cornellier v. American Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Parker v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Board of Trustees of Maryland Teachers & State Employees Supplemental Retirement Plans v. Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Huffman v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF RALEIGHSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API