Powers v. Travelers Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The defendant’s motion for judgment upon the verdict should have been allowed. The first issue was answered by consent; and the contract insured the intestate against bodily injuries effected solely by external, violent, and accidental means, as therein set out, subject to specific conditions and limitations. Among these limitations is this: that the insurance should not cover death resulting wholly or partly from several designated agencies, one of which is “firearms.”
The insured and the defendant had the legal right to enter into the contract, and the parties are bound by its terms. “In the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Penn v. Standard Life & Accidental InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Bray v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
3Cited by27 opinions
- Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A. v. Medflow, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- C. D. Spangler Construction Co. v. Industrial Crankshaft & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.