Legal Opinion

Pathman Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 30, 1986No. 136-85CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge:

This case arises from a contract dispute between plaintiff, Pathman Construction Company, Inc., and the United States. Plaintiff seeks an equitable adjustment of $522,907.28. Defendant moves for dismissal on the ground that the claim is untimely-

I. Statement of the Case

Pathman Construction Company, Inc. contracted with the General Services Administration (GSA) for the installation of interior finishings in the John C. Kluczyn-ski Federal Office Building in Chicago, Illinois. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Cosmic Construction Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  5. H & M Moving, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pathman Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Kunz Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Kunz Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Malissa Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  5. Dawco Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API