Legal Opinion

Dawco Construction, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 16, 1987No. 450-86CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that plaintiff’s claim for equitable adjustment under a contract with the Department of the Navy was time barred by the 12-month statute of limitations contained in the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 u.S.C. § 609(a)(3). That Act requires the contracting officer, upon receipt of a properly certified claim over $50,000 to issue a decision within 60 days or tell plaintiff when the decision will be answered, provided however, that if the contracting officer fails to render a decision within the required…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pathman Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Pathman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maryland State Police v. Warwick Supply & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Summit Contractors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API