Legal Opinion
Kunz Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 9, 1989No. 83-84-CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Kunz Construction Company, Inc., having prevailed on the merits,1 *has applied under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), for the attorney fees and expert witness expense it incurred prosecuting this contract action. Plaintiff had sought damages of $29,178.40 and was ultimately awarded $8,354.17. Kunz seeks an award of $64,492 ($64,292 for attorney fees and $200 for an expert witness report). For reasons hereafter set forth, plaintiff’s application is granted in part and denied in part. The amount of plaintiff’s award shall be determined…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Mary Jane Ruderman Hirschey v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Long Lake Energy Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army, Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army, Sierra Club v. Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Levernier Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- California Marine Cleaning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Griffin & Dickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- PCI/RCI v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.