Legal Opinion
Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 10, 1967No. 371PublishedCited by 237 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
delivered the opinion of the Court.,
The standard disputes clause in government contracts requires that “any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this contract,” not disposed of by agreement, shall be decided by the contracting officer, with the right of appeal within 30 days to the depártment head or his representative (normally a board of contract appeals) whose decision shall be final “unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, arbitrary, capricious, or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to imply bad faith.” The “arising under” claims…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Angel Soto v. Unknown SweetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Edward Spannaus v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.