Legal Opinion

Malissa Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 31, 1986No. 102-86CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SMITH, Chief Judge.(1) Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, it is ordered as follows:(a) The defendant’s motion is denied as to the plaintiff’s claim in the amount of $33,018.00. The July 10, 1985, letter from the plaintiff to the contracting officer satisfies the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 605(a) requirement that a written claim be submitted requesting a final decision. The letter clearly identified the amount of monetary compensation requested, stated that it wanted the matter resolved within 60 days…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. H.H.O., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  2. LaCoste v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  3. Vemo Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. G & H Machinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  5. Turner Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pathman Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Maryland State Police v. Warwick Supply & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Kunz Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Witherington Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Malissa Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API