Legal Opinion

State v. Buie

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 2009No. COA07-1522PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Defendant James McQueen Buie appeals his convictions for first-degree sexual assault, robbery with a dangerous weapon, second-degree kidnapping, and first-degree rape. He argues that the trial court erred in allowing the admission of character evidence about the alleged victim and the narration of video surveillance tapes by a police detective. After careful review of the record, we hold that the trial court committed error in the admission of this evidence; however, finding the error to be harmless, we affirm.

At trial, the State presented evidence tending to show the following:…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. MurilloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. Fontaine v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  3. State v. BelkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Paige v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API