Legal Opinion

State v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1975No. 4PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendants assign as error the ruling of the trial judge allowing the cases to be consolidated for trial. Each defendant contends that his constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution was violated by the reception of evidence of admissions by one of his codefendants which implicated him in the crime charged which evidence was inadmissible against him.

The trial judge may, in his discretion, order the consolidation for trial of two or more indictments in which the defendants are charged with…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API