State v. Belk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
Defendant Jerry Lenell Belk appeals his convictions for felony breaking and entering, felony larceny after breaking and entering, and obtaining habitual felon status. He argues that the trial court erred by allowing a police officer to testify that Defendant was the individual depicted in a surveillance video tape. After careful review, we hold that the trial court committed prejudicial error by admitting the testimony of Officer Ring, identifying the Defendant as the person depicted in the video surveillance tape, and remand for a new trial.
At trial, the State presented evidence…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carey Antonio PIERCE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Kenneth Timothy Dixon, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fontaine v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- People v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. WeldonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.