Legal Opinion

Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1952No. 92PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendants’ chief assignments of error challenge the action of the trial court in (1) excluding evidence proffered by the defendants in support of their counterclaim, (2) allowing the motion for judgment of nonsuit on the counterclaim, and (3) the charge of the court on the issue of debt in the plaintiff’s action.

1. The excluded evidence and judgment of nonsuit in respect to the counterclaim. — The excluded testimony consists of a mass of extrajudicial declarations and statements allegedly made by the plaintiff’s agent Snyder, by which the defendants sought to prove that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. SmithermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Hester v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Jones v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. West v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Carolina Equipment and Parts Company v. AndersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API