Legal Opinion

Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1989No. 8817SC526PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of its motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. “The purpose of a motion for a directed verdict is to test the legal sufficiency of the evidence.” Hitchcock v. Cullerton, 82 N.C. App. 296, 346 S.E. 2d 215 (1986). “In passing on a motion for directed verdict, the trial court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, and conflicts in the evidence together with inferences which may be drawn therefrom must be resolved in favor of the nonmovant.” DeHart v. R/S Financial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Carolina Equipment and Parts Company v. AndersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Troxler v. Charter Mandala Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Medlin v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Ladonna Harrison v. Edison Brothers Apparel Stores, Incorporated, and Melvin Wall, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Burgess v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API