Legal Opinion

Phelan Ex Rel. Estate of Phelan v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 28, 2004No. 3:02CV1219 (JBA)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 117] 1

ARTERTON, District Judge.

After de novo review, Magistrate Judge Joan Glazer Margolis’ recommended ruling [Doc. # 134] is approved and adopted with the expansions set forth below. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b). Accordingly, defendant Daimler Chrysler Corporation’s (“DCC”) motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 117] is GRANTED.

Count one of plaintiff Angela Phelan’s amended complaint alleges generally that, beginning in April 1979 and continuing to the present, DCC has committed and continues to commit CUTPA violations in the designing, manufacturing,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Handler v. Remington Arms Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. Blanchette v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Bound Brook Ass'n v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Trilegiant Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  2. Melnick v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  3. WESTON v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API