Legal Opinion

Handler v. Remington Arms Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 26, 1957PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

This negligence action was brought to-recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the named plaintiff and expenditures made and to be made by the other plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. From the judgment, rendered thereon the plaintiffs have appealed. In the assignments of error they claim that the court erred in refusing to charge the jury as requested and in the charge given.

The plaintiffs offered evidence to prove, and claimed to have proved, the following facts: On January 6, 1951, the named plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, was sixteen…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Morris v. PlattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
  3. Leblanc v. GrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Jump v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Dickson v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Josephs v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API