Legal Opinion
The M. J. Rudolph
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 12, 1923No. 257PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The libelants -brought this suit in admiralty as owners of the steam tug David F. Roche, on their behalf *741and on behalf of the crew of the tug, against the steam lighter and against any and all persons having or claiming to have any interest therein, in a cause of collision, civil and maritime.
It is alleged that in the afternoon of July 29, 1918, the steam tug, bound for Fulton street, Brooklyn, was proceeding up the Fast River on the Brooklyn side, about off Pier 7, the tide being ebb and the weather clear, when the steam lighter, bound up the river astern of the tug,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The Ludvig HolbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- The Maria MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The Great RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Martug Towing Co. v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Coastwise Transp. Corp. v. Charles Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- The Holly ParkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Northern Nav. Co. v. Minnesota Atlantic Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.