State v. Meade
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*337GILLETTE, J.
In this criminal case, defendant was charged with sodomy and sexual abuse, based on allegations that he had unlawful sexual contact with his girlfriend’s eight-year-old daughter. The trial court granted defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress certain statements that he made to two Lake Oswego detectives during a police interview. On appeal by the state, the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the statements were admissible. State v. Meade, 146 Or App 202, 933 P2d 355 (1997). We allowed review and now affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
Two plainclothes police…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SparklinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CharboneauOregon Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. VondehnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. TerryOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. McAnultyOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.