Legal Opinion

State v. Vondehn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2010No. CC C040956CR; CA A128800; SC S056371PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*464WALTERS, J.

This criminal case raises two questions of first impression regarding the right against compelled self-incrimination in Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution1 and the consequences of the failure to give Miranda warnings to a person who is in custody and subjected to custodial interrogation.

The uncontested facts establish that the police arrested defendant on a warrant, handcuffed him, and placed him in the back seat of a patrol car. A police officer then asked defendant two questions about a backpack that the officer had found in the car in which defendant had been a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. McAnultyOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. JarnaginOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. Moore/CoenOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. Avila-NavaOregon Supreme Court · 2014

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API