Legal Opinion
State v. McAnulty
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 2014No. CC 200927457; SC S059476PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
This case is before us on automatic and direct review of defendant’s judgment of conviction by guilty plea and sentence of death, following a penalty-phase trial before a jury, for one count of aggravated murder. See ORS 163.095; ORS 138.012(1); ORAP 12.10. For the reasons stated below, we affirm defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentence.
I. BACKGROUND
We begin with an overview of the facts admitted into evidence during defendant’s penalty-phase trial. See State v. Acremant, 338 Or 302, 305, 108 P3d 1139, cert den, 546 US 864 (2005) (reciting facts from penalty-phase evidence where…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Avila-NavaOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. EastepOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 2018
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.