State v. Sparklin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*87ROBERTS, J.
The question is whether defendant’s request for an attorney at arraignment bars all police interrogation undertaken without the presence of counsel, unless defendant volunteers information on his own initiative and not in response to questioning, and statements are otherwise voluntarily obtained.
Defendant was arrested in Eugene after security personnel at a retail store notified police of their suspicion that defendant and his companion, Taylor, purchased merchandise with a stolen credit card. The credit card was issued to Steven Mansell. The next morning defendant was arraigned on…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Minnick v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CharboneauOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MageeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.