Legal Opinion
Gajewski v. Pavelo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 22, 1994No. 11404PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This matter is currently before us on remand from our Supreme Court. Gajewski v. Pavelo, 229 Conn. 829, 643 A.2d 1276 (1994). When we first heard this case, we applied the general verdict rule and affirmed a judgment for the defendants that followed the denial of the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the jury verdict. Gajewski v. Pavelo, 32 Conn. App. 373, 629 A.2d 465 (1993), rev’d, 229 Conn. 829, 643 A.2d 1276 (1994). Our judgment was reversed because we should not have applied the general verdict rule. We, therefore, must now reach the plaintiffs’ claims of instructional error not addressed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Evon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Burns v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gajewski v. PaveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Moss v. Wyeth Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Glucksman v. WaltersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Cotto v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF NEW HAVENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.