Legal Opinion
Gajewski v. Pavelo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 6, 1996No. 15203PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Per curiam
Under General Statutes § 52-572q,1 a provision of the Connecticut Product Liability Act, a *29product may be defective solely because a manufacturer or seller has failed to provide adequate warnings or instructions to a claimant who has suffered harm because of the absence of such warnings or instructions. In this certified appeal, the only issue is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court did not commit reversible error in its jury instructions on the scope of the statutory duty to warn.
The plaintiffs, Maria Gajewski, Jan Gajewski and Janusz Gajewski, filed a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whisper Wind Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Gajewski v. PaveloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Gajewski v. PaveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Board of Education v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Castagno v. WholeanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Oakley v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Murphy v. BuonatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Cotto v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF NEW HAVENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.