Legal Opinion

Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1964No. 40023PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The question presented by this appeal is whether a payment bond regularly issued by the defendant bonding company, the terms of which assures the principal’s payment “ * * * to all persons supplying labor and material in the prosecution of the work” performed under the particular construction contract for which issued, was intended to cover suppliers who furnished repairs and accessories for equipment used in construction work.

This question evolves from the factual situation hereafter summarized, as disclosed by the pleadings and the evidence, included in transcripts of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. County Board of Equalization v. Muskogee Industrial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. Municipal Excavator Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Fuller v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Amerman v. State Ex Rel. Bromide Crushed Rock Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Darby v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. City of Tulsa v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API