Legal Opinion

Amerman v. State Ex Rel. Bromide Crushed Rock Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 16, 1925No. 15467PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion, by

PINKHAM, C.

The defendant in error, Bromide Crushed Rock Company, a corporation, as the beneficial plain-riff, instituted this action against M. R. Amerman and Globe Indemnity Company, a corporation, for the recovery of the sum of $2,043.92, alleged to he due the defendant in error.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

■The material facts necessary to a proper understanding of the controversy in this ease are as follows:

On the 1st' day of December, 1921, the state of Oklahoma, by and through the Highway Commissioner, entered into a contract in, writing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Lohr & Trapnell v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Kolp v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fox v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. O'Neal Steel Company v. Leon C. Miles, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Eagle Oil Co. v. AltmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Standard Accident Insurance v. BasoloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API