Amerman v. State Ex Rel. Bromide Crushed Rock Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion, by
PINKHAM, C.
The defendant in error, Bromide Crushed Rock Company, a corporation, as the beneficial plain-riff, instituted this action against M. R. Amerman and Globe Indemnity Company, a corporation, for the recovery of the sum of $2,043.92, alleged to he due the defendant in error.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
■The material facts necessary to a proper understanding of the controversy in this ease are as follows:
On the 1st' day of December, 1921, the state of Oklahoma, by and through the Highway Commissioner, entered into a contract in, writing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railroad v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lohr & Trapnell v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Kolp v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fox v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- O'Neal Steel Company v. Leon C. Miles, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- Eagle Oil Co. v. AltmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Standard Accident Insurance v. BasoloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.