Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Public Employees Relations Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 2, 1990No. 68858PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice:
Two questions of serious concern to municipalities and their employees are presented: (1) Is a chartered, “home rule” city • obligated to bargain in good faith under the state Fire & Police Arbitration Act as to a wage provision contained in an expired collective bargaining agreement? (2) Is such a city obligated to continue paying its employees under a wage provision in an expired collective bargaining agreement until a new agreement is reached? Our answer to the first question is “Yes”. Our answer to the second is “No”, if the City’s obligation to continue such payments…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re Appeal of Cumberland Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- McVicker v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF COUNTY OF CADDOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Thomas B. Hennigh v. City of Shawnee, Terry Powell, and Hank LandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- City of Durant v. CicioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Neptune v. NEPTUNE TP. ED. ASSOC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- City of Hugo v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.