Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 2, 1926No. 16035PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
The State Highway Department awarded a certain contract to M. R. Ammerman for the construction of a public highway in Okmulgee county. The contractor executed a builder’s bend pursuant to section 7486, O. O. S. 1921, conditioned to answer for labor and material used in the construction of the public improvement. The Globe Indemnity Company became a surety for the faithful performance of the conditions of the bond for the contractor. Thereafter M. R. Ammerman assigned the contract for the construction of the highway to Fuller & Company, a partnership. It is contended by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
- Rittenhouse & Embree Co. v. F. E. Brown & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Eagle Oil Co. v. AltmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- W. R. Pickering Lbr. Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Hyde Const. Co. v. Fricken-SchmidtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.